<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Jitter on Decades of Musings on HiFi</title>
		<link>/topics/jitter/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Jitter on Decades of Musings on HiFi</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="/topics/jitter/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Don&#39;t Look Back in Anger: Re-evaluating Decades of the Jitters</title>
				<link>/articles/dont-look-back-in-anger-jitter/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>/articles/dont-look-back-in-anger-jitter/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This article re-evaluates three decades of jitter in the terms of my position paper &lt;a href=&#34;/articles/audio-hereticks-progress/&#34;&gt;The Audio Heretick&amp;rsquo;s Progress&lt;/a&gt;: signal fidelity against audible fidelity, and the single-number &lt;button type=&#34;button&#34; class=&#34;term&#34; popovertarget=&#34;term-9&#34; title=&#34;FOM: figure of merit&#34;&gt;FOM&lt;/button&gt;&lt;span id=&#34;term-9&#34; popover class=&#34;term-pop&#34; role=&#34;note&#34;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FOM: figure of merit.&lt;/strong&gt; A single number, such as THD&amp;#43;N, SINAD or jitter in picoseconds, used to sum up signal fidelity, with the claim that a better number means better sound. It relates to audible fidelity only at the extremes. &lt;a href=&#34;/articles/audio-hereticks-progress/#the-fom&#34;&gt;The Audio Heretick&amp;#39;s Progress: the FOM &amp;rarr;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
